C O L L E G E
THIS WEEK'S COLLEGE GAMES
Last Week's
College Games
| Thursday,
December 3, 2009 |
| MST |
TV |
Favorite & Rating |
Spr. |
Underdog & Rating |
Score |
+/- |
| 5:00p |
- |
Arkansas State |
68 |
6 |
Western Kentucky* |
59 |
24-20 |
+ |
| 7:00p |
ESPN |
Oregon* |
102 |
5 |
Oregon State |
100 |
37-33 |
+ |
| Friday,
December 4, 2009 |
| MST |
TV |
Favorite & Rating |
Spr. |
Underdog & Rating |
Score |
+/- |
| 6:00p |
ESPN2 |
Central Michigan** |
92 |
7 |
Ohio U. |
85 |
20-10 |
+ |
| Saturday,
December 5, 2009 |
| MST |
TV |
Favorite & Rating |
Spr. |
Underdog & Rating |
Score |
+/- |
| 10:00a |
ABC |
Cincinnati |
100 |
1 |
Pittsburgh* |
96 |
45-44 |
+ |
| 10:00a |
ESPN2 |
Houston |
93 |
2 |
East Carolina* |
88 |
32-38 |
- |
| 10:00a |
ESPN |
West Virginia |
94 |
1 |
Rutgers* |
90 |
24-21 |
+ |
| 10:30a |
BIG10 |
Illinois* |
86 |
5 |
Fresno State |
84 |
52-53 |
- |
| 12:00p |
 |
Louisiana Tech* |
84 |
21 |
San Jose State |
66 |
55-20 |
+ |
| 1:00p |
|
Boise State* |
104 |
48 |
New Mexico State |
59 |
42-7 |
+ |
| 1:30p |
ABC |
Southern Cal* |
96 |
6 |
Arizona |
93 |
17-21 |
- |
| 2:00p |
CBS |
Florida** |
113 |
7 |
Alabama |
106 |
13-32 |
- |
| 4:30p |
FSN |
California |
98 |
11 |
Washington* |
84 |
10-42 |
- |
| 5:00p |
|
Florida Atlantic |
69 |
1 |
Florida Int'l* |
65 |
28-21 |
+ |
| 6:00p |
ESPN2 |
Connecticut* |
94 |
9 |
South Florida |
88 |
29-27 |
+ |
| 6:00p |
ESPN |
Georgia Tech** |
97 |
3 |
Clemson |
94 |
39-34 |
+ |
| 6:00p |
ABC |
Texas** |
111 |
14 |
Nebraska |
97 |
13-12 |
+ |
| 9:30p |
ESPN2 |
Wisconsin |
93 |
10 |
Hawaii* |
80 |
51-10 |
+ |
| *Home
Team = + 3 points |
**Neutral
Field |
| Spr.
= Expected Pointspread |
| Straight-Up
Record: 540-162, 76.9% thru 12/05 |
+ =
Straight-Up Correct Pick |
|
FCS PLAYOFF GAMES
| Saturday,
December 5, 2009 |
| MST |
TV |
Favorite & Rating |
Spr. |
Underdog & Rating |
Score |
+/- |
| 10:00a |
|
Southern Illinois* |
86 |
4 |
William & Mary |
85 |
3-24 |
- |
| 12:00p |
|
Montana* |
85 |
13 |
Stephen F. Austin |
75 |
51-0 |
+ |
| 1:30p |
|
Villanova* |
88 |
11 |
New Hampshire |
80 |
46-7 |
+ |
| 5:00p |
|
Richmond* |
84 |
6 |
Appalachian State |
81 |
31-35 |
- |
COLLEGE TOP 30
As of Sunday, November 29, 2009
| The
Pigskin Index Top 30 College Teams |
| Rank |
Team |
Rating |
Rank |
Team |
Rating |
| 1 |
Florida (12-0) |
113 |
16 |
Stanford (8-4) |
98 |
| 2 |
Texas (12-0) |
111 |
17 |
Miami, Fla. (9-3) |
98 |
| 3 |
Alabama (12-0) |
106 |
18 |
California (8-3) |
98 |
| 4 |
T.C.U. (12-0) |
106 |
19 |
Georgia Tech (10-2) |
97 |
| 5 |
Boise State (12-0) |
104 |
20 |
Nebraska (9-3) |
97 |
| 6 |
Ohio State (10-2) |
103 |
21 |
B.Y.U. (10-2) |
96 |
| 7 |
Oregon (9-2) |
102 |
22 |
Pittsburgh (9-2) |
96 |
| 8 |
Oklahoma (7-5) |
101 |
23 |
South Carolina (7-5) |
96 |
| 9 |
Cincinnati (11-0) |
100 |
24 |
Southern Cal (8-3) |
96 |
| 10 |
Texas Tech (8-4) |
100 |
25 |
Tennessee (7-5) |
96 |
| 11 |
L.S.U. (9-3) |
100 |
26 |
Oklahoma State (9-3) |
96 |
| 12 |
Oregon State (8-3) |
100 |
27 |
Iowa (10-2) |
95 |
| 13 |
Arkansas (7-5) |
100 |
28 |
Nevada (8-4) |
95 |
| 14 |
Virginia Tech (9-3) |
99 |
29 |
West Virginia (8-3) |
94 |
| 15 |
Penn State (10-2) |
99 |
30 |
Clemson (8-4) |
94 |
The Pigskin Index is designed to give a
quick comparison of the relative strength of all covered teams. To see how a game should
turn out, simply compare the ratings of the competing teams and add 3 points to the home
team. For example, a visiting team with a rating of 100 should be 7 points stronger than a
home team with a rating of 90. 100 - (90 + 3) = 7. In neutral field games (such as many
bowls), no home team advantage may be appropriate.
Our Current 2009 Pigskin Index Ratings
120 Division 1-A Teams
Please Send Comments to: gsh@powerratings.com
Updated Saturday, December 5, 2009
Contents © 2009 Gary Hawley · Denver, CO
All Rights Reserved
The information at this site is for news and
entertainment purposes only.
Use of this information in violation of federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
PowerRatings.com does not endorse or recommend the services of any advertiser.
The advertiser you select is solely responsible for its services to you, the customer.